Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts
UK police on London jihadi: “There is a possibility we will never understand why he did this”
MARCH 25, 2017 8:25
They’ve arrested many people in connection with the attack, but they say he acted alone. He was a “very religious” Muslim following an Islamic State modus operandi — running down people in a car and then getting out and stabbing — that other Islamic jihadis have followed in the recent past, and they say, “We must all accept that there is a possibility we will never understand why he did this.”
British officials don’t admit that there is an Islamic jihad against Britain and the non-Muslim world in general, and so of course they don’t understand why he did this. When the last pockets of resistance are conquered and Sharia is fully implemented in Britain, the last Briton who remembers that Britain was once a free society but, like the overwhelming majority of his countrymen, is concerned above all to observe politically correct niceties and never appear “racist,” will say of his new masters and overlords: “We must all accept that there is a possibility we will never understand why they conquered and subjugated us.” Maybe that person will be Neil Basu.
“Westminster attacker acted alone and motive may never be known, say police,” by Ewen MacAskill, Guardian, March 25, 2017:
Police investigating the Westminster attack have concluded that Khalid Masood acted entirely alone for reasons that may never be known.
In the most detailed breakdown yet of events on Westminster Bridge and parliament on Wednesday, police said that the entire attack, in which Masood had killed four people before being shot dead, lasted a mere 82 seconds.
After four days of intensive inquiries across England and Wales, involving hundreds of officers, the Metropolitan police said they had so far failed to establish the reason for the attack. It is continuing to look at whether Masood was prompted by online propaganda by Islamic State, which has claimed he was a “soldier”, or whether he had some other sense of grievance.
But deputy assistant Metropolitan police commissioner Neil Basu said: “We still believe that Masood acted alone on the day and there is no information or intelligence to suggest there are further attacks planned.”
The security services do not like the term “lone wolf”, feeling that it glamorises an attacker, and instead prefer “lone actor”. Although 11 people were arrested in the aftermath of the attack, eight have since been released, with no further action to be taken. A 58-year-old man remained in custody on Saturday and two more have been released on bail.
Police are investigating media reports that Masood checked his encrypted messaging service WhatsApp – or even sent a message – just before the attack, which hinted at others being involved. The police statement confirming that he was a lone actor does not appear to support suggestions that he had been in touch with an accomplice.
Basu, who is the senior national coordinator for UK counter-terrorism policing, said: “Even if he acted alone in the preparation, we need to establish with absolute clarity why he did these unspeakable acts to bring reassurance to Londoners, and to provide answers and closure for the families of those killed and the victims and survivors of this atrocity.
“We must all accept that there is a possibility we will never understand why he did this. That understanding may have died with him.”…
De burgemeester van Londen is een moslim en zijn politie komt dan met de conclusie, dat het totaal onduidelijk is, wat het motief was van de aanslag, terwijl er eerst herhaaldelijk door diezelfde politie over een “islam gerelateerd motief” gesproken werd.
In de islamscene in Birmingham werden 8 arrestaties verricht, maar de conlusie is dan, dat het weer een “eenzame moslim was, in Engeland geboren en later moslim geworden”, volledig geintegreerd en het heeft dan niets met islam gte
Het zijn de grootst mogelijke schoften en landverraders, die zo praten, de burgemeester van Brussel is eerlijker, zie
En die leugens blijven dus maar kunnen doorgaan, ondanks onze democratie en parlement en vrije media .
Iemand een idee hoe dat kan of is dan toch de enige conclusie: we worden belazerd waar we bij staan door de elite, die ons de import van zoveel mogelijk jonge mensen door de strot wil duwen om de vergrijzing op te vangen?
Onder het mom van “alle mensen zijn goed en we doen aan vrijheid van religie, ook de islam is een gelijkwaardige religie” , aldus Gert-Jan Segers van de CU en de meeste andere kamerleden, behalve dan PVV en FdD.
Zie hier het toppunt: https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2017/03/25/british-pm-jihad-not-islamic/ , zelfs Therese May zegt dat het “niets met de ware islam te maken had”
Moge onze hemelse Vader al deze leugenaars in de politiek, media, kerken en syanagoges ontmaskeren voor wat ze zijn: landverraders.
Shalom, alleen in Yeshua te vinden,
Ben Kok (joods-chr. pastor)